The Comfort Tax

Now is as good a time as any to conjure up the historic event that occurred during the first full month of my professional career in finance.  It was August 31, 1998 – still the early earnings of the dot-com boom.  The S&P 500 Index lost 6.8% that day to end an abysmal month for stocks (what would equate to about a 1,700 point decline in the Dow using today’s values).  Yet it was not the 6.8% decline for stocks that was unprecedented.  Although rare, the stock market had seen far worse one-day declines. 

The unprecedented event was that the “fear index”, officially known as the CBOE Volatility Index or “the VIX”, increased above the level of 40 for the first time ever.  Without getting into all the nerdy details, the VIX objectively measures a market-implied risk level using option prices.  In the summer of 1998, investors were panicking about the abrupt Russian government default and the VIX rising above 40 objectively reflected the grave fear.  It was unfathomable that a developed government such as Russia with the ability to print more of its currency (rubles) could fail to repay its own debt.  Long Term Capital Management, a hedge fund team consisting of Nobel laureates and some of the most successful investors ever, was losing billions of dollars.  It was publicly collapsing for all to see.  The fear was real and it was rampant.  The stock market was in chaos.

What became evident with the passage of time was that this unprecedented event and the unsettling world events that led to it represented a buying opportunity.  Wealth was again transferred from the impatient to the patient.  Over the year that followed, the S&P 500 Index gained 39.8%. 

In the aftermath of August 1998, the VIX eclipsed 40 on six different occasions.  Following these seven occasions – August 1998 and the six times to follow – an investment in the S&P 500 Index yielded an average return over the subsequent 3 years of 37.1%.  The median 3-year return after the VIX topped 40 was +50.9%.

Today – February 28, 2020 – the VIX broached the magical 40 hurdle for the eighth time on record.  To be clear, 40 is an arbitrary number.  We could use 36.41 as the key VIX threshold to denote unusually high levels of investor fear and the numbers from the prior paragraph would look very similar except it would smell like data-mining.  40 is a nice round number so it more easily passes the smell test.  There is nothing any more magical about 40 than there is about 36.41. 

This morning at 9:30am, the VIX cleared 40 for the first time since 2015 and so here we are in another panicked environment where the loudest voices are the ones promoting chaos and hysteria and recession. 

We have been here before.  The scenarios and soundbites were all different but, in a way, they are all the same. And in all these historical environments, fearful sellers have voluntarily paid a tax.  Not an income tax.  A comfort tax.  Selling in the face of panic for whatever comfort the selling provided has been a tax – with the proceeds of this tax collected and amassed by those who could mute the noise, turn off the 24-7 news, maintain a level-head, and appreciate the volatility for what it was.

Just something to keep in mind.

Market Perspectives – February 25, 2020

To remove any doubt, I claim no unique expertise in viruses, pandemics, or COVID-19, specifically.  I am not going to cite R0 transmission rates or reference virus mortality rates to appear well-versed on pandemics and make predictions about where stocks are going next.  Nevertheless, I will share a few comments regarding the recent stock market volatility, which is a decided reaction to the perceived threat of a global pandemic. 

First, this is the obligatory reminder that stock market volatility is normal.  Stocks go up.  And down.  Extended periods of calm as we enjoyed throughout 2019 do not change the fact that stocks have higher expected returns because they bear additional risk.  It is reasonable to be frustrated by market volatility but we should not be surprised by it.  The financial services industry is overwhelmingly littered with disingenuous fortune tellers making people think that they can avoid uncertainty that cannot be avoided. 

Second, assessing whether the recent market volatility is an overreaction or an underreaction to the coronavirus requires advance knowledge of how widespread the epidemic will become and the resulting economic impact.  If COVID-19 ends up as a global pandemic that causes hundreds of millions of people to stop travelling, eating out, shopping, or going to work for an extended time period, then the recent market selloff is likely just the beginning of a larger stock market selloff.  If, however, the epidemic plays out much like scares of the past such as bird flu in 1997, SARS in 2002, swine flu in 2009, or Ebola in 2014 and is eventually contained without long-term economic impact outside of a few countries, then the recent selloff is just another market overaction and a buying opportunity. 

Is this an overreaction?  Maybe.  Maybe not.  Any “investment expert” who suggests with confidence right now that the market is overreacting or underreacting to the coronavirus epidemic is blatantly fooling themselves and/or misleading anyone who listens to them.  What we know is that investors tend to overreact to negative risks.  Not always – but most of the time.  Bad news just gets amplified far more loudly than good news.  So purely from a probabilistic perspective, scares tend to result in overreaction.  But that doesn’t make this scare an overreaction.  It just makes it more likely to be one. 

Third, we should pay homage to and learn from history.  History teaches us that the stock market rewards patience.  It rewards discipline.  It rewards long-term perspective.  Those rewards are paid for by the impatient, by the undisciplined, and by the short-term investors.  The market transfers wealth from individuals who wait on the sidelines “for things to calm down” to investors who stay disciplined.  Investing in the stock market is not a free lunch and it is the scary periods that provide the reward for the disciplined investors.    

Fourth, most investors do not care about diversification and high-grade bonds and rebalancing and uncorrelated investments and maintaining an appropriate risk level when the market is going up.  If we are being honest, all of those things are boring and frustrating when the market is advancing.  But these same concepts are the hallmarks of a strong investment approach and they earn their value during periods of heightened market stress such as these past two days.    

As always, comments, questions, or concerns are welcome and can be posted in the comments section below.